Join me @ IBOtoolbox for free.
Eric Wilson
Member Since: 2/7/2018
  
performance / stats
Country: United States
Likes Received: 139
Featured Member: 0 times
Associates: 280
Wall Posts: 373
Comments Made: 125
Press Releases: 308
Videos: 49
Phone: (815) 372-1363
Skype:    
profile visitor stats
TODAY: 19
THIS MONTH: 780
TOTAL: 56592
are we ibo associates?
active associates
victor chukwuemeka    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Phil Schaefer    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Michael Gielfeldt    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Arlene Dovichi     
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


PHIL SCHAEFER    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Tommy Olsson    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Camille Cameron    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Emmanuel Amedu    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Micky Gramlin      
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Dorothy Allen    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Laci Kollar    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Athena Gay    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Jordan Angelovski    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


John Williams    
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


Italia or Elze       
Last logged on: 5/26/2019


other ibo platforms
Eric Wilson   My Press Releases

What Happens If SCOTUS Rules in Favor of King in King v. Burwell

Published on 11/23/2018
For additional information  Click Here

In the coming weeks the Supreme Court of the United States will rule on the lasted Affordable Care Act challenge King v. Burwell.  The wording of the law is critical.  The wording of the law says individuals whose incomes fall within a specified range are eligible for premium assistance tax credits to purchase insurance through exchanges established by a state.  The key words are established by a State.  That is what the court case is about.  It does not say for purchases made through a Federal exchange.

In 2012, the Internal Revenue Service issued a rule that said not only were the credits available in state based exchanges but also in the 34 other states who did not set up their own exchanges.

The plaintiffs are arguing that subsidies in Federal exchanges are not legal.  The Government is arguing that it was never meant to mean “a State” but “all States”.  Regardless of what the intent was, the court will rule on if those Americans in 34 States who are receiving Advanced Premium Tax Credits (subsidies) will be able to keep them.

If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff, those receiving subsidies in the state base exchanges, would then, pending a Congressional Amendment lose their subsidies.  It is believed that roughly 8 million people are receiving subsidies in states that are being run by the Federal Government.

Now to clarify, those who lose their subsidies do not lose their insurance.  The insurance carrier would still provide the coverage they have selected except, the client would not pay the full price.  This in many cases will be too expensive for many of the policy holders to keep, so you may see them “cancel themselves.”

One of the key elements of the law is the individual mandate, which is what requires everyone to purchase insurance or pay the fine ( or tax) which in 2016 is 2% of your Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI).  If your premium is more that 8% of your household income, you are exempt from having to purchase insurance and the tax.  If the subsidies disappear, you will have many Americans whose premium is now greater than 8% of their household income.  They can drop coverage without penalty.  If there is no incentive to purchase insurance, you will see a lot opt out.  Of course if there is no tax penalty it reduces revenue to the IRS.

Now we do not know how the Supreme Court will rule, we also do not know what Congress will do if the subsidies are deemed illegal.  We do not know what the President of the United States will sign off on, but here are some ideas that have been floated around.

The states could try and rush to set up their own exchanges.  You have witnessed the rollout of healthcare.gov and they had a few years to get it done.  I cannot imagine they could roll it out even in six months.  We have also seen failures of state based exchanges in California and Hawaii.   I do not see many states taking on that burden.

Member Note: To comment on this PR, simply click reply on the owners main post below.
-  Copyright 2016 IBOsocial  -            Part of the IBOtoolbox family of sites.