Join me @ IBOtoolbox for free.
Delbert Larson
Member Since: 5/4/2015
  
performance / stats
Country: United States
Likes Received: 774
Featured Member: 3 times
Associates: 555
Wall Posts: 1381
Comments Made: 1480
Press Releases: 295
Videos: 0
Phone:
Skype:    
profile visitor stats
TODAY: 14
THIS MONTH: 667
TOTAL: 138888
are we ibo associates?
business links
recent videos
active associates
Emmanuel Mba     
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Annie Diamond    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Karen Stroeh    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Patrick Pierre     
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Mervyn Drury    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


John Madeira    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Gail Fields     
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Bobby Brown    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Norbert Pacan    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Roderick Mackenzie     
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


James Kelly    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Mobolaji Ajibola    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Csaba Juhasz    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Tony Harnett    
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


Jimmy Diggs  
Last logged on: 12/11/2017


other ibo platforms
Delbert Larson   My Press Releases

Elementary Particles, Part J-1 - The Preonic Wars: Early Battles

Published on 3/21/2017
For additional information  Click Here

Elementary Particles, Part J-1 - The Preonic Wars: Early Battles

In this series of PRs I am focusing on a question that has intrigued mankind for millennia, and that question is "What is the World Made Of?" In Parts A and B we looked at the history of proposed answers to this question, eventually arriving at the present theory of quarks, leptons and force carriers, which combined is known as "The Standard Model". In Parts C and D we saw how a new particle model - the ABC Preon Model - can model nature's particles in a way that is different from the Standard Model. In part E we looked at neutrinos, quarks and weak interactions in the ABC Preon Model, in part F we looked at preonic masses, and in Part G we investigated additional high energy physics (HEP) experiments. In part H we compared the ABC Preon Model to its competition, and in part I we summarized and put a perspective on the previous parts. In part J we'll take a look at some of the difficulties I have had with getting the word out concerning the ABC Preon Model.

---

Despite the superiority of the ABC Preon Model over the Standard Model, I have been unable to gain any traction when I try to present my work in front of scientific audiences. My experience has been similar to a series of "battles" in an intellectual "war" and my next series of posts will describe the struggle so far.

My struggle has often seemed outright bizarre to me, as I have had an extremely hard time whenever I've tried to present the ABC Preon Model. One of my first attempts was at the SSC. At the SSC, they had let me present my thoughts about the possible lack of a length contraction, and the next month I applied to present my Preon model. But I was told that I would only be allowed one presentation, since there were many others who also wanted to speak.

Later, while I was the lead accelerator physicist on a Fermilab project, I tried to present the idea informally to several scientists. At that time, on slide two or three, a colleague started raising loud objections and shouting me down, causing the end of the attempt before it even really began. He was determined not only to reject my ideas, but to also make it impossible for anyone else to hear them. I never got past slide three.

Numerous times I have sent the ABC Preon Model to scientists that I come to know, and the response is almost always total silence - I get no response nor acknowledgement at all, even after numerous attempts.

At one point Fermilab wanted some help with their injector accelerator; the deal was that in exchange for my help I would be able to give a talk to a High Energy Physics conference scheduled at the time - I wanted no money for my work, I just wanted to present my model as payment. They agreed. I delivered on my end of the bargain, designing a system that would greatly improve their injector using a technique we perfected in an earlier project. But when I got there I was given 10 minutes one on one with a volunteer who agreed to hear me. It was during one of the coffee breaks, and we had to find a spot in a hall. He said it was interesting, and could find nothing wrong, and that was the end of me hearing from him. For a long time, this "silent treatment" seemed like the oddest thing.

Finally I realized that I've been dealing with a religious response, not a scientific one. To get into "the clergy" (of high energy physics) you need to have "faith" (in the Standard Model). My alternative to their faith is "apostasy" to their beliefs. It is truly sad. Of course it could be worse - the new clerisy has not (at least not yet) used tactics like the Inquisition!

Index of Elementary Particles, Part J - The Preonic Wars

Elementary Particles, Part J-1 - The Preonic Wars: Early Battles

Elementary Particles, Part J-2 - The Preonic Wars: Posting to Wikipedia

Elementary Particles, Part J-3 - The Preonic Wars: Deletion from Wikipedia

Elementary Particles, Part J-4 - The Preonic Wars: Moving On From the Deletion from Wikipedia

Elementary Particles, Part J-5 - The Preonic Wars: Recent Events, Posts at IBO and ATS

Elementary Particles, Part J-6 - The Preonic Wars: Looking Ahead

Elementary Particles, Part J-7 - Summary and Index of The Preonic Wars

---

Do you want to help bring fusion to the world? Join BookWormBiz and make money growing your business! When you make money, the corporate BookWormBiz makes money too! And BookWormBiz is devoted to using a significant portion if its money to bring fusion to the world! Click here for details on BookWormBiz!

Member Note: To comment on this PR, simply click reply on the owners main post below.
-  Copyright 2016 IBOsocial  -            Part of the IBOtoolbox family of sites.